The Repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy

Any Opinions?

Don't Ask Don't Tell was an alright policy but it was just a quick fix and I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did. Personally, I don't believe that queers should be allowed to serve in any branch of the military. (Except the Coast Guard! LOL! (Just kidding the Coast Guard does its job and does it well.)) I definitely believe there should be a "No Fags" policy because gays can distract other soldiers with their fruity ways, causing discomfort among the ranks (I know I wouldn't wanna shower with a fag.) They can prevent the straight soldiers from completing their mission efficiently and therefore fags are an unneeded distraction

I mean what why would a gay wanna join the military for anyway other than to look at other guys wing dang doodles. Besides we all know fags are evil aliens from another planet that seek to suck our brains out through our bumholes and turn us into their mindless slaves.

To be frank, I don't know if a queer could hold a gun anyway.

That was offensive.

TheCindyCrawfordMethod wrote:Don't Ask Don't Tell was an alright policy but it was just a quick fix and I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did. Personally, I don't believe that queers should be allowed to serve in any branch of the military. (Except the Coast Guard! LOL! (Just kidding the Coast Guard does its job and does it well.)) I definitely believe there should be a "No Fags" policy because gays can distract other soldiers with their fruity ways, causing discomfort among the ranks (I know I wouldn't wanna shower with a fag.) They can prevent the straight soldiers from completing their mission efficiently and therefore fags are an unneeded distraction

I mean what why would a gay wanna join the military for anyway other than to look at other guys wing dang doodles. Besides we all know fags are evil aliens from another planet that seek to suck our brains out through our bumholes and turn us into their mindless slaves.

And this wasn't?

Touche.

Indeed. But I think,(returning to topic) that I could see on either side of this conversation.

You mean to say that you are Bisexual?!

No, I am saying that the other side has a good argument. Technically, they were discriminating against these people. But now it is over so, it probably doesn't matter what I think.

First of all as I said earlier they are not people but brain sucking aliens. Second of all gay people are different and should be treated so. If that is discrimination is it not also discrimination to have car seats for small children or extra large seats on rollercoasters for fat people in need of excitement?

No, that is applying to the needs of the people.
(And I have never seen an extra large seat)

It does make me mad when Webber says that his kind (the brain/penis sucking aliens) is the new "norm"

I would hope that they are not becoming the norm..... that is a little scary.

More like alot scary. We live in Waynesville, North Carolina a primarily christian and anti-gay area. Imagine what its like in places like San Francisco!

That would be awful! I believe that gay is not the way. Its just nasty.

I agree. Also shut up Tj.

I made this topic. Its not my fault I am used to looking through all prospectives.

I wouldn't be able to live in such a place. If we ever get a gay president, I am moving to Afghanistan.

Haha I'll come with you! If we even get a gay governor I'm bombing the white house. (Not really I was just joking, FBI.) Same goes for a female president I was very scared at how close Hilary got. The place of president should be reserved for middle-class, straight, white, men. (Sorry Bill Gates and that black homeless man who lives under the bridge.)

Way to be an Elitist

Elitism for the win!

Incredible. you are so narrow minded. why'd you change my post?

I changed it in a fit of RRAAAAGGGEEE!!!!!

Haha wow. Good Job James.

Why thank you Charles! Its good to have my work appreciated. Might I have another Kudos?


Also we're getting off topic.